| Maytag Community Innovation awards available locally | |
| Date | September 30, 2004 |
| Section(s) | Local News |
| Brief | |
| Application forms are now available from the Maytag Corporation Foundation for the 2004 Community Innovation Awards.
In the United States, each of the 11 communities where Maytag has major U.S. operating facilities, employee committees have funds available from the foundation to award grants, generally in the $500 to $2,500 range, to non-profit charitable or educational organizations. Locally, programs in Jasper County that address issues or problems in the following categories are eligible: families, youth (including teens and preschool), emergency services, community betterment (include recreational and cultural programs), education and program addressing issues of the elderly, persons with disabilities and health-related programming. Awards will be made only for innovative programs, those that are creative, new, enhanced or expanded. Awards will not be granted for general operating budgets. Interested non-profit organizations should contact Lou Ann Hill by phone at 787-6357 or by e-mail at lhill@maytag.com to receive an application. The deadline to submit grant proposals to the Community Innovation Awards Committee is Oct. 18. Grant awards will be announced by the end of the year. The Maytag Corporation Foundation is the primary source of charitable contributions made by Maytag Corp. The foundation’s support is focused primarily on education, family life, community betterment and employee involvement. |
|
Archive for September, 2004
Newton does have the best work force
September 27, 2004| Newton does have the best work force | |
| Date | September 27, 2004 |
| Section(s) | Opinion |
| Brief | |
| To the Editor:
I could not believe the words in front of me as I read about Mr. Krivoruchka’s speech in Sept. 22nd’s paper… Mr. Krivoruchka got one word wrong in his description of our perception of Maytag. Maytag is a 1,000 pound gorilla and (not or) it is the home of the best production work force in the world. They haven’t seemed to really recognize that yet. I will let people more informed than me respond to the specific economic assertions in the article, but I do know this. Newton employees have earned every penny and every benefit they have received over the years and still made a profit for Maytag. They will have to hire two to three workers elsewhere to replace one worker in Newton. The people of this community have done more than their share … As I’ve written before, I worked at Maytag, but I am not a “Maytager.” In fact, I am more proud to say I am a UAW member who worked at Maytag. I feel deeply for the men and women still working in the plants. They have to be the ultimate judge of their relationship with this company … Mark Babcock Newton |
|
How can Maytag and Newton work together?
September 27, 2004| How can Maytag and Newton work together? | |
| Date | September 27, 2004 |
| Section(s) | Opinion |
| Brief | |
| To the Editor:
In our Newton Daily News of Wednesday, Sept. 22, 2004, I read Maytag company seeks a partnership with local community I do sincerely hope to see those words stated by a Maytag representative Mark Krivoruchka become a reality. I quote Mr. Krivoruchka “We need to find ways to work together.” I also repeat my being in agreement with Mr. Hake’s words in the Sunday, Aug, 29, Des Moines Register, “Amazing things can happen if people get on the same side and work together to solve problems.” Maytag has been and is a great company, full of hard working people… Maytag is not only an icon of Newton, but a very important part of the community in many ways … I know we cannot all eat steak, however I know society should have compassion for the human race … In my struggle to understand what is happening in this great country of ours, I find we are becoming owned by other nations. With this happening we the little folks are, I am afraid, picking up the taxes that would have been paid by tariffs and/or American owned companies. Many companies are no longer American owned. Today a product may be built in the United States, however if it is not American owned that means less tax dollars are paid to the IRS and state. So … we make up the shortage of the tax dollars … I give the Chrysler merger as an example that did what seemed to be a 50/50 merge. However according to what I read, this became 25 percent American owned and Germany owns the rest. Remember the tax and who makes up the difference? OK! My questions are: How can we the (workers and community) work together with Maytag to ensure Newton’s future, or as some have said, do we need Maytag at all? Finally should we not all write a few congressmen and other political leaders about our concerns? And please, will someone tell me how gambling and race tracks are constructive to the life and times of Newton? Just one more comment. If the federal, state, local city or county government invents a job, who pays the salary? So if nothing is being manufactured, should we not see a benefit to the community? Now if we depend on gambling and/or others to make playtime activities, please tell me how can that can be constructive to the economy? I’m not saying we do not need those jobs and playtime. However, it seems to me if there is not at least a few tangible products produced it is a fairy tale! Of course Walt Disney did well. James Wilson McKinstry Newton |
|
Lawyer’s win big
September 17, 2004| Lawyer’s win big | |
| Date | September 17, 2004 |
| Section(s) | Columnists |
| By Peter Hussmann
Editor |
|
| Let’s start with money — $8.25 million to be exact.
That’s how much the three law firms — in Philadelphia, St. Louis and San Francisco — stand to split amongst themselves as counsel in the proposed settlement agreement recently announced by Maytag in the class action lawsuit filed on behalf of early generation Neptune washing machine owners. The suit claimed that design flaws in the first models produced at the Newton facility resulted in the growth of excessive mold and mildew inside the machines, as well as wax motor and circuit board failures that left the washers inoperable. Though Maytag denies the claim — and says it attempted to fix all the problems brought to their attention by early Neptune owners — the corporation said it decided the best course of action was to agree to the proposed settlement that allows affected owners the opportunity to recoup any costs incurred to fix or replace their machines. In addition, the corporate spokesperson noted the design problem was rectified in early 2000 and does not impact the current machines being produced, even though they’ve allowed any Neptune purchaser to August 2004 to be a part of the class by notifying them of their rights under the terms of the settlement. But let’s get back to the lawyers and the potential award they’ll receive should an Illinois court allow the settlement to go forward at a hearing set for late November. Many people say that they are nothing but opportunists using a skewed legal system that let’s them make a ton of money off corporations. While the Neptune owner who might have experienced the problem might get their couple hundred dollar repair bill returned — should they have retained all the proper repair documentation — the lawyers will be investing their earnings in a new boat. And we’re not talking about a bass boat here. (There were several Web sites set up by the law firms involved in the class action suit asking Neptune owners who had experienced problems to log on to their sites and report the problems experienced.) But let’s look at the other side. The Neptune, when it was first introduced, drew a $1,000 price tag, no small amount. Consumers plop down such amounts because they deem it to be a superior machine, one that will provide superior service. When it prematurely fails, it makes owners mad, especially if your new silk blouse now reeks of mold. While Maytag says it tried to rectify the situations owners experienced, many apparently weren’t satisfied. Internet consumer chat boards have been full of gripes about the Neptune for some time. Most were not happy campers. So they did the American thing: They sued. But who can blame them? They should have. A Cadillac-priced machine is supposed to work as advertised. It’s a good thing Maytag is standing up, taking the heat and putting its money where its mouth is concerning its dependability reputation. Nip it in the bud before things spin (or don’t) out of control. It will be interesting to see what the court does with the lawyer fee proposal at the settlement hearing. Will members of the class complain about the proposed fee agreement? Stay tuned. |
|