| Galesburg board votes to bill Maytag $94,000 for school taxes | |
| Date | October 29, 2004 |
| Section(s) | Local News |
| Brief | |
| BY JOYCE KELLY
PEORIA JOURNAL STAR Special to the Newton Daily News GALESBURG — The Knox County Board has decided the county should simply send Maytag Corp. a bill instead of suing the company for about $94,000 members believe the company owes School District 205. The board voted 14-1 on the resolution during its meeting Wednesday. Board member Lowell Mannhardt voted no. The consensus among other members was that by simply sending a bill, the county would recoup taxes while avoiding the image of being unfriendly to businesses, a concern held by area planners and some officials. Knox County State’s Attorney Paul Mangieri first approached the board in August to ask members to support a proposed lawsuit against Maytag, which has laid off about 1,600 workers as it plans a complete exit in February. Mangieri had determined Maytag owed, from a more than 10-year period, about $1 million in abated taxes to six Knox County taxing bodies within an enterprise zone: the County Board, School District 205, the city of Galesburg, the Town of the City of Galesburg, the Galesburg Sanitary District and Carl Sandburg College. Mangieri needs at least one taxing body to agree to the lawsuit. Up until Wednesday, all but two taxing bodies had objected to the lawsuit: District 205, which is still investigating possibilities, and the County Board. Mangieri believes Maytag was allowed up to $1 million in abatements for all six taxing bodies collectively. In August, the County Board instructed Mangieri to negotiate on its behalf. The state’s attorney said Wednesday he contacted Maytag a while back and had “a good cordial give-and-take phone conversation.” Mangieri said the next correspondence he received was a letter to the taxing bodies, and he received a copy. He said Maytag does not think it owes the county anything, and that if it did at some point, the statute of limitation would make any obligations void. Board member Allen Pickrel said he believes Maytag does owe District 205 $94,000 and moved that a bill be sent Maytag. But neither he nor any of the other board members agreed to the $1 million amount Mangieri feels the county is owed. Board Wayne Saline agreed with billing the company. “It’s an issue of equality. If it were a resident of the county, we wouldn’t hesitate sending the bill. We need to send it (to Maytag),” he said, drawing applause from the audience. Maytag spokeswoman Lynne Dragomeir said the company remains open to communicating with the county. “The company always would receive communication from any group, of course, but the company has made its position clear that we believe it has paid its fair share,” she said. |
|
Archive for October, 2004
Don’t outsource jobs
October 18, 2004| Don’t outsource jobs | |
| Date | October 18, 2004 |
| Section(s) | Opinion |
| Brief | |
| To the Editor:
After seven years of loyal labor as an employee for Maytag in Newton, I was laid off on Sept. 27, 2004, a victim of outsourcing. Three and a half weeks after President Bush came to Iowa on Sept. 3 to remind us of all the work he has done to grow jobs, I was laid off. In less than four years of Bush’s leadership, Maytag’s Newton plant is about to be outsourced to Mexico. The President’s response is to give companies who outsource jobs to Mexico like Maytag special tax breaks. In three weeks we need to let George W. Bush know that we want to keep working Iowans working. We need to let George W. Bush know we want to encourage companies to keep jobs here, not shipped overseas. We need a President who will work to create jobs, not encourage companies to lay off workers. I would love to take my grandchildren to parks and buy them gifts. With four more years of Bush economics, I am not sure when or if I will be able to do that again. Brenda Breckenridge Newton |
|
Help workers in America
October 14, 2004| Help workers in America | |
| Date | October 14, 2004 |
| Section(s) | Opinion |
| Brief | |
| To the Editor:
My family and I pretty much live from paycheck to paycheck. My wife, Nicole, and I have three kids, one with a disability. We don’t have a lot, but we were living pretty well until I got laid off from Maytag this summer. It was a shock to lose my job and scary to think about how I was going to support my family. How were we going to pay the bills? What would we do without health insurance? I was one of the lucky ones who got called back, but the experience was a wake-up call for me and my family. I was laid off again two weeks ago. Now, it’s hard to hear this administration talking about how the economy has “turned the corner” and the country is growing again. I look at many of my friends who are out of a job and have no real prospects and, from my perspective, this is no turn-around. We’ve lost a lot of good-paying jobs here in Iowa. Everyday, I read how we’re losing more. If Iowans are buying this “rebounding economy” story, then I have a bridge in London to sell. Why are our tax dollars building schools and creating jobs in other countries? We need leadership who tell us the truth and who help the workers in America. Scott Danks Newton |
|
Where are the jobs?
October 12, 2004| Where are the jobs? | |
| Date | October 12, 2004 |
| Section(s) | Opinion |
| Brief | |
| To the Editor:
After more than seven years of work for Maytag in Newton, I was laid off by one of “America’s Most Admired Companies” because they outsourced my job to Mexico. Maytag felt that they could be more profitable if they shipped 190 jobs down to Mexico on Sept. 24 I guess that $4.7 billion in business isn’t profitable enough; they felt the need to lay off over 1,000 people between Jan. 7, 2002, and Sept. 24, 2004, (iowaworkforce.org.) I hear President Bush talking about how we are “turning the corner” on our economy. My wife and three children are skeptical since Iowa has seen over 27,000 manufacturing jobs lost since Bush took office in 2001. Bush touts his economic record and claims to be “making progress.” My family and I wonder when that turn will hit Newton because the mission has not been accomplished by this administration on job recovery. Doug Bishop Baxter |
|
Why change prescription plan?
October 7, 2004| Why change prescription plan? | |
| Date | October 07, 2004 |
| Section(s) | Opinion |
| Brief | |
| To the Editor:
I attended the meeting that Maytag had for the retirees the other day concerning prescription mail order. First, I would like to say it was a rather poor presentation. I think Maytag and Caremark were surprised by the number of retirees that showed up. I don’t think they learned much as a lot of them got up and left during the presentation. This brings me to my next thought. Maytag talks a lot about being in partnership with the community. Why on earth are they determined to hurt and/or ruin the pharmacies in Newton? To mandate that all active and retirees do mail order for their prescriptions is beyond me. Whatever happened to freedom of choice? I am also curious if this is as cost effective as they would like us to believe. I have tried to find out by asking for a cost comparison report but was told by Caremark I would not see one. After I returned to work that same day someone from the Maytag company called me and said very adamantly that I would not see a report. If this is for the betterment of all employees and retirees I am all for it. I do wonder if this is only going to be good for the two companies involved. My last comment will be, if this is what Maytag considers a partnership with the community, you best watch out. Maria Modlin Kellogg |
|