| Hake: Maytag will ‘migrate products’ | |
| Date | January 28, 2005 |
| Section(s) | Local News |
| Brief | |
| By PETER HUSSMANN
NDN Editor Continued reductions in staffing levels at Maytag production facilities in Newton may lie ahead as Maytag continues to target “factory utilization” as a cost saving measure in the coming year, Maytag CEO Ralph Hake said following release of the corporation’s fourth quarter results today. Speaking in a conference call with business reporters, Hake said the corporation will “migrate” product platforms to its most cost-effective production operations throughout the coming year. “We will migrate products to our more cost-effective factories,” he said. “Work forces in those facilities will grow while work forces will continue to shrink (in the least cost effective operations). This puts us in a better cost position with the intense competition. You will see more of that in 2005.” Although not expressly naming the local laundry facility operation, Hake has said in the past that “Newton is our highest cost facility.” Labor negotiations last year resulted in a new four-year agreement. However, Maytag said the cost savings generated under the new contract still did not make the plant eligible for new product platforms. Maytag Corp. reported a fourth quarter loss of $14.1 million or 18 cents a share including the costs of a company restructuring and litigation over a front-load washing machine. The Newton-based appliance manufacturer’s results compared to a profit of $23.9 million or 30 cents a share a year ago. The quarter included charges of 12 cents per share for the company-wide reorganization and 13 cents per share to set aside money related to the early generation front-load washer litigation. A charge of 1 cent per share was reported for the closing of a refrigerator plant in Galesburg, Ill. Results would have been about 8 cents a share excluding the charges. Analysts surveyed by Thomson First Call expected fourth quarter earnings of 17 cents a share. Sales for the quarter were down 8.4 percent to $1.16 billion, compared to $1.27 billion for the same period last year. Hake said lower sales in Hoover floor care equipment and vending machines and higher steel costs also contributed to the loss. “Higher raw material and energy costs significantly impact our operating results for the quarter and the year,” Hake said, in a statement. “We have addressed our challenges head on, and have taken decisive steps to improve Maytag’s performance going forward.” For the full year 2004, the company reported a loss of $9 million or 11 cents per share, compared to income of $120.1 million, or $1.53 per share in 2003. Excluding charges year-end earnings would have been about 88 cents a share. Analysts’ expectation was for a profit of 97 cents. Sales were $4.72 billion, down 1.5 percent from $4.79 billion in 2003. Operating income was $40.3 million for 2004 versus $228.3 million for the prior year. Hake also lowered the company earnings guidance for 2005, saying the company expects reported earnings per share of $1.10 to $1.50 in 2005 including about 5 cents for restructuring charges. Previous guidance was between $1.50 and $1.60 including the restructuring charge. Hake said he expected 2005 to be a better year. “It’s not business as usual for Maytag,” he said. “We’re a leaner organization that’s becoming more responsive on all levels. We expect to benefit in the coming year from our ‘One Company’ cost reductions and our stream of innovative products, including the new Maytag 27-inch washer and dryer, Jenn-Air suite of reflective glass appliances, the FloorMate hard floor cleaner and a premium upright introduction, among others. As we work through the first quarter, we also expect to benefit from favorable pricing initiatives, which were announced late last year.” At 10:30 a.m. today, Maytag’s stock was down $1.63 to $15.42, a 9.56 percent drop. Trading was heavy with more than 4 million shares traded. Associated Press writer David Pitt contributed to this story. |
|
Archive for January, 2005
Iowa buys Maytag’s attention for now
January 27, 2005
| Iowa buys Maytag’s attention, for now | |
| Date | January 27, 2005 |
| Section(s) | Opinion |
| Brief | |
| What does Amana have over Galesburg? Not enough old world, family dining halls in Galesburg? No PGA caliber golf courses?
Whatever it is, Maytag Corp. seemed eager to add 200 new jobs and retain 550 more at their Amana refrigerator plant in return for government incentives that are nowhere near the windfall lavished upon the company a decade ago by Galesburg. Iowa promises $1.5 million in tax credits and Economic Development Director Mike Blouin heralded the deal as a blow against global outsourcing. Uh huh. It may look that way from Des Moines. But in the Quad-Cities, 43 miles north of Galesburg, that $1.5 million seems less than quaint. Maytag took that, plus $6 million more in state of Illinois grants that looked every bit like a blow against global outsourcing in 1992. Then Maytag took another $4 million in local tax breaks. And $3 million cash incentives paid for by hiking sales taxes on the Galesburg residents who are still paying even after Maytag shuttered its plant last year. That’s $13 million in incentives for about 10 years of jobs. Galesburg made refrigerators. The Amana plant makes refrigerators. The Amana expansion involves value-added, high-tech jobs, re-engineering refrigerators so that better products can be made more cheaply. “This product will help improve Maytag’s competitiveness in the refrigerator market,” company representative Karen Lynn said. The company sang a similar tune a decade ago in Galesburg: “Maytag decided to redesign not only the product but also the manufacturing process from the ground up,” Managing Automation wrote about the Galesburg innovations back then. If $13 million in taxpayer incentives buys jobs for a decade, how much can Iowa expect for $1.5 million? Quad City Times Contact the Quad-City Times Editorial Board at opinions@qctimes.com. |
|
We need to expand our business base
January 27, 2005| We need to expand our business base | |
| Date | January 27, 2005 |
| Section(s) | Opinion |
| Brief | |
| To the Editor:
To the Newton City Council, I agree with your tough decisions recently and you are going to make some people mad, but you also need to look at your position in the future if you can promote other facilities to build here. Please do all in your power to help and look at the big picture in the future. I believe we wouldn’t have all these budget cuts; more corporate taxes would be paid. Like in past years, we had Saturn, 3M, Barella, all three major industry providers wanting to build here. That would have created more work force locally and more local revenue. But being so Maytag-whipped, our city council voted not to make things possible to accept them. I believe these hardships have come from bad decisions in the past from all aspects of the community not being more inclined to opening our doors to new industry and welcoming change. Peter J. Swank Newton |
|
People are worried
January 20, 2005| People are worried | |
| Date | January 20, 2005 |
| Section(s) | Opinion |
| Brief | |
| To the Editor:
I think that we would be better off if we got rid of some of the top end people in the city. If we had just the city council and not all the highly paid administrators and directors and advisors maybe we would be better off. I can’t see where all this advice that we are paying so highly for has brought any new large employers into town. In fact it hasn’t been able to keep our long time home bred employer (Maytag) to stay here. Maybe we wouldn’t be having grandiose ideas like the race track shoved at us when a good share of us taxpayers feel that it is not going to be successful, even if it does get built. There have been so many unanswered questions about the race track, we as taxpayers are worried. Are we going to be stuck with a big bill when our biggest employer is trying to move out of town? Let us scale back our thinking into a more sensible realm and maybe life would be less stressful here in Newton. Mick Drew Newton |
|