| Why Whirlpool bought Maytag | |
| Date | May 30, 2006 |
| Section(s) | Opinion |
| Brief | |
| To the Editor:
The vote (recently) on the $70 billion tax relief bill for corporate America was generally split down party lines. The Republicans passed it in both houses. California Representative Drier (R) bragged that he was born to cut taxes. He was oh so proud. The spiel — “This tax relief was badly needed because, to keep this great economy booming, corporate America needs that extra money for research and development and to expand and to hire more people to work in that expansion, etc., etc.” Well, people of Newton, Iowa, certainly understand that Republican reasoning. We know now that Whirlpool bought Maytag to create more jobs. Whoops. I mean Whirlpool bought Maytag because they needed to add a good, hard-working workforce. Whoops. I mean they spent their hard-earned tax relief to buy up jobs and kill them (the jobs). Well, at least they spent their hard-earned tax relief on facilities. Whoops. I mean they bought the outdated Maytag facilities as leverage to get our governor to build greatly needed updated facilities. Whoops. Wrong again. Whirlpool has no use for any new facilities. Well, research and development is vital to any company; number one reason Republicans give for needed tax relief. This must be the reason Whirlpool bought Maytag. Whoops. Wrong again. Maytag’s R and D lagged behind Whirlpool’s. No need for last century’s technology. So what did Whirlpool buy with their hard-earned tax relief windfall? Than answer is obvious. The only thing Whirlpool didn’t have was Maytag’s market share. I’ll quit with the sarcasm and be blunt. Whirlpool didn’t acquire Maytag, they killed Maytag. Maytag could have been sold to the investment group that planned to fix mismanagement and resell Maytag as a viable company. It wasn’t because then current management would not have been able to plunder and vote themselves millions of dollars. Now, Maytag’s market share, along with its jobs and facilities, can be buried and disappear. The only thing to reappear in Whirlpool’s pocket is Maytag’s market share. Thank God for Republican tax relief. Whoops. More sarcasm. Stuart Allspach Baxter |
|
Archive for May, 2006
Why Whirlpool bought Maytag
May 30, 2006Newton man says leaders must take a stand for labor rights, standards
May 25, 2006| Newton man says leaders must take a stand for labor rights, standards | |
| Date | May 25, 2006 |
| Section(s) | Opinion |
| Brief | |
| To the Editor:
As I ponder the collapse of Maytag in Newton, I am trying to remember when I first encountered the phrase “worse case scenario thinking.” I believe it was during my first six weeks of Air Force training at Amarillo Air Force Base, Texas, in 1968. Reflecting on possible events such as a full nuclear exchange with the Soviet Union was not pleasant. But sometimes it is helpful for even the most optimistic person to be prepared for the worst. When Matthew 19:26 attributes to Jesus the statement “… for God all things are possible” I think we have to assume that the word good could have been included — for God all good things are possible. However, to say that some event is possible is not the same as saying it is probable. Some politicians of both parties could use a dose of realism. Many elitist Republicans have a disturbing view of globalization. They seem to think capital should pursue low wages all over the world. In their view, wages should be driven down all around the world ad infinitum. Free trade may be a good idea, but the United States needs to use a full court diplomatic effort to get countries such as China to give a higher priority to labor rights and labor standards. The appliance industry may be extremely competitive on a global basis. But to maintain dignity and prosperity here in America, we need political leaders who will make negotiations over labor rights and labor standards as integral parts of ongoing international negotiations. Michael Thielmann Newton |
|
Newton woman remembers the Maytag family
May 25, 2006| Newton woman remembers the Maytag family | |
| Date | May 25, 2006 |
| Section(s) | Opinion |
| Brief | |
| To the Editor:
Through the years I’ve heard different views on how Maytag has treated the labor force. Some of the workers felt they were unfairly treated while others were happy to be working where they received good wages, a good medical plan and a good retirement plan. Years ago, the employees were proud to be working for Maytag and one of the reasons was the demeanor of Fred Maytag and his wife, Ellen. There are those that can tell you about Fred Maytag. He was well known as a man who would stop by a construction site and showed interest in what the workers were doing and why. When he went on a cruise, he would strike up conversations with fellow passengers and ask if they wouldn’t like a Maytag washer. When the delighted acquaintance would accept, Fred would reach in his pocket and hand over one of the many Maytag advertising washers he had stashed in his pocket. Mrs. Maytag was also no snob. One day she entered a shop in Newton. One of the clerks was busy with another customer and did not notice Mrs. Maytag. When the clerk realized Mrs. Maytag was waiting, she apologized profusely. Mrs. Maytag then told her, “If I ever see you neglecting a customer to wait on me, I just won’t come into your shop again.” Their housekeeper and cook, Mrs. McClelland, was a member of our local club. When it was her turn to host our club, she told us that Mrs. Maytag had told her to have us come into the Maytag mansion for our meeting. We were welcome to bring our swim suits and take advantage of the pool. As we were sitting by the poolhouse, eating refreshments off Mrs. Maytag’s fine china and drinking tea from her fine crystal, one of the members asked what she thought of us meeting there. Mrs. McClelland replied, “She’s in at the sink, washing dishes right now.” Fond memories of the Maytag family. It is sad that we have no such memories of the latter managers of the company. Betty Snook Newton |
|
Union member corrects letter to editor in Register
May 23, 2006| Union member corrects letter to editor in Register | |
| Date | May 23, 2006 |
| Section(s) | Opinion |
| Brief | |
| To the Editor:
In his letter to the editor, “Union leaders led workers astray,” (Des Moines Register, May 13) Mr. Brad Morford states that union leaders at Maytag “have encouraged people to strike and refuse automation.” I don’t know from what authority Mr. Morford speaks, as I find no record of him being a member of UAW Local 997 in Newton, Iowa. On the other hand, during my 40.9 years’ seniority relationship with Maytag in Newton, I also was a union representative in various positions for 35 years. Therefore, I do speak from authority on the subject of strikes and automation at Maytag in Newton. First, Maytag in Newton was organized in 1937. Since that time, to date, there have been only six strikes during this 69 years. In my involvement, the union leadership has not “encouraged people to strike,” the membership makes that decision by secret ballot. Second, at Maytag in Newton, the union has never “refused automation.” Management makes the decision whether to automate, they don’t ask the union for permission. So I am at a loss as to how the union can “refuse automation.” In fact, Maytag in Newton has gone through periods where they did automate and it has turned out to create jobs. Unfortunately, the most recent management turned all that around. Other facts that Mr. Morford might find interesting (include) the Union negotiated an employee involvement program whereby the members in the plants would be involved with management to cut cost. Those cost savings alone, since 2001, have saved Maytag in Newton $167 million (company figures, not mine). The concessions in 2004 saved the company millions more. However, management was making decisions that were more costly than what the union and its membership was saving the company. For example: $70 million on free airline tickets if you purchased certain products. (The airline tickets cost more than the products). Management decision on a failed China deal, $95 million. Management’s decision to start up and after three years close a facility in South Carolina. Settlement of at lease one lawsuit due to management’s decision not to recall and repair certain products. That, Mr. Morford, is just the short list. You might want to get your facts straight before you write your anti-union letters. Oh, yes, the guy that played a major role in destroying a great company walked away with $19 to $20 million. You no doubt believe that is OK. Max L. Tipton Newton |
|
Rebuilding a more solid Newton
May 18, 2006| Keeping In Touch: Rebuilding a more solid Newton | |
| Date | May 18, 2006 |
| Section(s) | Columnists |
| Brief | |
| By DENNIS BLACK
State Legislator The ramifications of the closing of the Maytag operations in Newton are felt in many, many ways. Initially, we think of the families affected by the action, and the heartache and uncertainty that come with a life of anticipation of having a good job, and providing for the needs of their loved ones. Although transition occurs for many, there yet remains the anguish and concern, for the working men and women must move on to salvage their family’s future and well-being. We have but one mortal life, and throughout that life decisions are made that affect many in addition to ourselves. There was no reason to think that the men and women who decided to work at Maytag were facing what since has come to pass. After all, many were fifth generation workers, and just a few years ago, the reputation of the company was solid, stock prices were high, and production was calling for multiple shifts and overtime. Never shall I understand how the poor and provincial decisions of those in corporate leadership resulted in their being awarded with riches that would take most of us a lifetime to spend. Many things are in the works, and additional conversation from five meetings I had over the weekend point to the fact that the new focus on Newton’s future should not have most of the eggs placed in a single basket. Diversification is the key, and manufacturing a variety of products enhances sustained economic viability and community vitality. As a community, we have a great reputation, and Maytag’s workers were known for their education, training and dedication. Theirs was pride in a product with nationwide exposure, and even my travels abroad for agricultural sales and trade resulted in many identifying their knowledge of the Maytag brand. The sooner we approach decision makers regarding potential manufacturing opportunities, the sooner a sense of stability will return to our community and citizens. With the massive infrastructure that exists along with the buildings that served Maytag, a plethora of options must be pursued. One example would be that of wind-energy generators and blades. My Natural Resources Committee, in one of the last bills before session adjournment, passed a “Wind Energy Tax Credit” bill. This was intended to serve as an incentive for those seeking to invest in wind farms, with the sustainable, renewable wind energy electrical production sold into the grid of electric companies. Yet, if you order a wind generator with its tri-configured massive blades, you have to wait 18 months to receive it. Ironically, most are made in Germany, and Newton with its central location is perfect. Many other ideas are in the offing, but again it is essential for community leaders to pause, reflect on the past, and be innovative in their consideration of the future. With the Iowa Values Fund available to assist in a variety of ways, revitalization won’t happen overnight, but we can rebuild the city into something far more solid in view of this global economy that is consuming worker and family ambitions and values. As a final note, Rep. Paul Bell and I will be introducing legislation this fall, which should be ready for consideration in January of 2007, that would specify that Newton and Fort Dodge be “held harmless” in FY 2007-09 with any reduced state-aid to their schools, resulting from the loss of students. Anticipating reduced enrollment, in many cases the costs of administration, utilities, transportation and other fixed expenditures of the Newton Community School District will remain fairly static. Our school’s administration needs the opportunity to evaluate the situation of enrollment adjustments, and plan accordingly. I would guess our colleagues, on a bipartisan basis, would agree with this approach, and thus we shall vigorously pursue that opportunity for our school and district property tax payers. |
|
Guest Commentary: Schools will open their doors next fall
May 18, 2006| Guest Commentary: Schools will open their doors next fall | |
| Date | May 18, 2006 |
| Section(s) | Columnists |
| Brief | |
| By STEVE McDERMOTT
Newton Community School Superintendent In response to both the recent Maytag news and to all the outside speculation of what will happen here, I feel the need to share a few facts related to our school district. Our Newton Community Schools will open their doors next fall, students will enter and teaching and learning will occur. No one is certain how many students will attend school here next August. I can assure you we will be staffed to serve at least as many students as were enrolled this school year. Our budget has been built and certified for the next school year. Staff cuts or major budget alignment moves will not be made until we see where our enrollment lands next fall. The official count day is always the third Friday in September. If our enrollment drops dramatically, we’ll need to adjust our budget and staffing levels accordingly. If enrollment remains fairly steady, we may not need to make major adjustments beyond moves dictated by high fuel prices or various other factors. Of course we hope for the best and prepare for the worst. No matter what happens, we will keep the community informed. If significant changes in our community schools are ever proposed, community members and stakeholders will have opportunities to share their thoughts before decisions are made. The fact is, after already losing approximately 2,600 jobs before last week’s news, our total enrollment has declined, but not as much as one would expect. We haven’t seen a direct correlation between the number of jobs lost and our enrollment decline. As I’ve told many people, we’ll have a nice town and quality schools here for a long time. What’s uncertain is how our community will evolve and how quickly it will rebound. Sometimes we get too caught up in the numbers. What may be my biggest concern is the loss of so many quality individuals from Newton, Kellogg and surrounding areas. We stand to lose many leaders, dedicated volunteers, caring neighbors, dependable contributors and outstanding young people. We realize many are now making decisions that will change the course of their lives and those of their family members. Our hearts go out to everyone working through this time of adversity. On the other hand, we all know the quality of life and many benefits this place has to offer. I’ve heard many encouraging stories of people finding ways to remain in Newton. New neighbors will join us in our community’s transition, as well. What I have witnessed here in children and adults alike is a general resilient nature. There are many people in this community that have risen above tough times before and they’ll do it again. We here at school will continue to do our best to support children and families no matter what challenges arise. Of course, education is our primary focus and we believe the best way to support our students is to make certain they are learning every day in our schools. If you have thoughts, ideas or suggestions related to our schools or the district’s future, please call me at 792-5809 or write to me at mcdermotts@newton.k12.ia.us. |
|